Speaker support surprise
Posted by: davidf on 31 October 2016
I have a quandary wrt my Focal Electra 1038be's support situation - system: all olive cds2, 01, 52,135s all on Fraim, powerlined in very large room with 16 ft cathedral ceiling with hardwood oak floor built over cement. Just had new ceiling put in to replace "popcorn" 1970s thin plaster board with thicker sheet rock - while room was worked on I had to move all furniture out including my hifi. Prior to the ceiling upgrade I had my fraim and the Focal speakers with spikes onto naim chips. After construction completed I replaced all furnishings and my hifi was reassembled except I left the short plastic-rubbery feet on the Focal's. I had replaced the spikes with the Focal feet to make it easier and safer to move the 112 lb beasts. What I have discovered with the reassembled system it that it sounds better with more bass energy -music has more bass and more punch. I had expected system to sound worse - with the spikes on the Focal's I had the speakers dead level and supported completely rigidly with no wobble whatsoever. With the Focal plastic feet speakers not level and rock slightly if you try to wiggle them. The music is more fun. I obviously still support Fraim with Chips.
Now some will say that my reassembled system had all the connections cleaned, etc. Yet I've reassembled my system many times and while it may have sounded cleaner and more pristine after system rebuild never more bass punch. My hypothesis is that the spikes into the Chips raised the Focal's approximately 3cm's off the ground and the plastic feet raise speakers less than 1cm. The Focal port fires our the bottom of the speaker and perhaps the augmented bass is related to the ports closrer proximity to the floor.
I'm thinking of forgoing the spikes and chips - with 4 feet per speaker replacing the spikes and getting them level is a pain in the butt. I was not expecting to like the sound of my system more without the spikes - wonder if anyone else ever experienced this phenomenon.
david
ps. I discount the change of ceiling to be the cause of my systems change in character- maybe ��
Posted on: 31 October 2016 by Jan-Erik Nordoen
"maybe"
Possibly, the stiffer sheetrock on the ceiling has helped tighten up the bass...
Posted on: 31 October 2016 by joerand
A few speculations:
1) the popcorn ceiling surface was more diffusive and the sheetrock is more reflective, or as Jan said simply stiffer (did you change the insulation or dead space behind the sheetrock?)
2) despite your best efforts the spikes & chips were not "perfectly" leveled throughout changes in temperature and humidity and introduced micro-rattle to the speakers while the rubber feet being more forgiving of true level may be providing "more" bass (though in that regard seems it would also be a less-defined bass), Tough to keep four spiked feet in the same plane through changes in weather on a hardwood floor,
3) in the same vein as above, and based on what you said about the speakers now rocking if you wiggle them with the rubber feet, maybe each speaker is now resting securely on three legs rather than micro-rattling between four. A three-point connection is better than a four-point if you can make it stand,
4) none of the above apply and the difference is due to the bottom port's distance from the floor as you've suggested. Closer to the floor would imply tighter bass. Same as you get placing rear ports closer to the wall.
Posted on: 31 October 2016 by Bob the Builder
I dont know if it is significant but I have Guru speakers and the designer states not to use spikes but to use the rubber foam feet he provides. Also because of their unusual shape (they are as deep as they are wide and they are unusually wide for standmounts) they are also supplied with a set of plates that rest on top of your chosen stands I also have these slightly leaning backward resting on some copper pipe insulation so that they point very slightly upwards. Resting on their stands my speakers are also slightly wobbly but the Bass already deep is deeper, fuller and rounder without any of the previous boom.
Posted on: 01 November 2016 by TOBYJUG
Could be that before with the spiked and levelled speakers bass energy was proportionate to other frequency energy. Using now the short plastic rubbery feet along with closer proximity of port to floor is creating a resonant peaked ridge at the 70 - 80 htz area.
Posted on: 01 November 2016 by davidf
with the spikes on Chips the speakers were rock solid- no wiggle at al.
with the plastic feet there is some wobble but these feet are more "cushiony"
new sheet rock place with new insulation. Not sure why this would give fuller bass
will give another listen tonight. Deep down I want to put the spikes on to get that rigidity but I sure had good listening seesion last night.
Posted on: 01 November 2016 by varyat
Hi David,
I sense that you will need to put the spikes back on just to give yourself peace of mind- it SHOULD sound better. A little tinkering is part of the journey!
ATB,
Mark
Posted on: 01 November 2016 by CharlieP
David,
Many good comments above. From your description, the new sheetrock ceiling will be participating in the bass noticeably less than the previous ceiling. This would surely sound better and truer to the music signal. There will very likely be a difference in sound between spikes or soft feet under your speakers. Which will be better? Only one way to find out. You have gone to the effort of moving out, replacing ceiling, moving back in... You know what to do, so don't stop now. You will learn something, and please share with us.
Charlie
Posted on: 01 November 2016 by Cheekymonkey71
You'll be amazed at the effect that different plaster boards and suspended ceiling tiles can have on the acoustics of a room. If you're previous board was the open cell rubbish from the 1970's that I think it is, I'm not surprised with the difference that you've experienced with a modern hard surfaced board. Is everything back in the same place as before? Could be that you've also hit a sweater spot with positioning?
Posted on: 01 November 2016 by Seth
FWIW I live in a modern apartment where all internal walls are fairly flimsy (honestly, walls wobble when you shut a door!) and this has caused me enormous problems with lacking bass - seems the walls can sink a lot of that energy. I've ended up with my system in the smallest room, as that's the only room where there's a decent amount of bass!
Posted on: 01 November 2016 by hungryhalibut
In the toilet? Surely not.
Posted on: 01 November 2016 by Christopher_M
Ah yes, the thunder box!
C.
Posted on: 01 November 2016 by Seth
Ah. Poor choice of phrase. I see my mistake now. ;-)
Posted on: 01 November 2016 by davidf
Update- replaced the rubber feet with spikes onto Chips. Still has that punchier bass. One thing I noticed was the Focal's are 5 inches further out in the room (on the short wall). So maybe a bass node thing? Or maybe new ceiling/insulation is really a factor.... if so nice upgrade but not cheap! However it makes me realize the potential effect of listening room on the music.
Posted on: 01 November 2016 by davidf
Verdict- new ceiling cause of improvement. Now with spikes/Chips back under the Focal's this is clearly better than rubber feet.. best my system has ever sounded. I'm pulling out different cd's to hear the effect on different music. It's just what I do when I upgrade a naim box. Except this was a complete and unexpected surprise. Nice
Posted on: 01 November 2016 by Adam Meredith
I thought you were ignoring the room in the elephant.
In France I had my system in a room with spectacular Quercy stone walls and solid floors. Unfortunately, the walls were dry-lined and the room, through this compliance, lost most of its promised virtues and removed the steady baseline from which sounds could emerge.
It was like boxing on a skateboard.