My current system consists of CDX2, 202, Hicap DR, Napsc, 200 (nonDR), Spendor sp3 /1R2, powerline on the CDX2, otherwise standard Naim cables.
Overall I am pretty happy with the music this system produces BUT there are a couple of problems. The treble is too bright. Given that the CDX2, the 202 and the Spendors all have the reputation for prominent trebles and my listening room has too much glass (for optimal acoustics) a certain amount of brightness is to be expected. The switch to the Hicap DR did a lot to tame it, but the over bright treble is still there specially on CDs from the early years of digital recordings.
The second problem is that the system produces virtually no information on the recording acoustic. The best audio systems which I have heard, as well as having numerous other virtues, let the listener know about this acoustic. How this is conveyed is unclear to me. I assume it is a combination of the hardware plus room acoustics and correct speaker positioning. So far I have failed to find it with this system.
So an upgrade may be in order.
To me the obvious upgrade in adding an XPS2 (preferably DR) to the CDX2. This conforms with source first etc and from everything I have read would appear to be entirely logical. It might also deal to some extent with the two problems mentioned above.
However a couple of dealers I have talked to have strongly recommended the 282 instead. This would lift the system into new territory and the bare CDX2 still has enough unexplored detail to keep the 282 happy.
By the way Philip Swift of Spendor has assured me that these speakers are perfectly capable of conveying the acoustic information in the right set-up. If you are thinking "well he would, wouldn't he", please don't. Philip Swift is, I am sure, an honest man. For the moment at least, assume the speakers are a given.
So which should I jump, 282 or XPS2?
(please do not say both, I know that, but funds just do not allow it at the moment)
David
Posted on: 12 May 2017 by ChrisSU
My first thought is that you should try a 282, but I'm not sure that will solve your treble problem either. Before you spend big money on box upgrades, are you sure that your system setup is good? What rack are you using, is your mains supply decent, and are your cables in good condition and properly dressed? In particular, check the soldering on your NACA5. Not to mention room acoustics. If you're happy that all the above is sorted, then go for the upgrades.
Posted on: 12 May 2017 by Harry
XPS2 is the obvious candidate. However, you will potentially get a treble boost because the XPS2 makes the CDX2 sound bigger and with more extension in both bass and treble. With bigger sound comes more space and it might be that this is the boost you need to open up the acoustic and spread the treble more evenly.
I'm not a fan of the 202 (all bass and treble) or the 282 (mechanical, contrived, artificial). I don't like how they sound but they don't sound bad, broken, unlistenable. I wonder if a bittle bit of room treatment might go some way?
I don't know your speakers although I have listened to and owned Spendors over many years. They never used to be renowned for treble emphasis. They were often accused of being too far the other way. I also know that when put on the end of a 552/300 the little S5e never sounded better. They loved it and performed like different speakers. So if the speaker isn't broken it'e either passing through whatever treble heavy signal your set up is outputting and/or interacting with a lively room to emphasise the treble.
Just some cushions and a couple of wall panels might be enough. Anything that cuts down reflections.. Walk around the room, listen standing up, listen with your back to the speakers, stand outside the room - does the treble always sound hot from all these locations?
Posted on: 12 May 2017 by wenger2015
I would certainly recommend dealing with your room acoustics first.
I don't see any reason for you to have this problem with your current system.
If you know your dealer well, their should be no reason to question his recommendations.