NDX running temperature
Posted by: Dingding on 13 August 2011
I understand that the uniti has one in the system status menu but I can't find one in my ndx menu. It would be handy to see how hot it's getting.
I don't see any such item on the menu, and NDX never runs really hot.
Agree with Aysil, no menu option and NDX hardly gets warm.
Simon
Why would you spend 3K+ on a high end streamer only to compromise SQ by using wifi?
I haven't seen or heard any convincing evidence that wifi affects SQ. There is a logical case to argue over 'drop outs' and reliability but with a decent setup I've always found wifi to the renderer rock solid.
Tog
Tog - I have compared the two - and other than Hidef WAV dropouts, there was a clearly clearer and more appealing sound from my NDX when using ethernet as opposed to Wifi whilst using the NDX DAC. I have not repeated it since I have started using the nDAC as I have now provided an ethernet patch lead through to the NDX from my livingroom switch.
Simon
Why would you spend 3K+ on a high end streamer only to compromise SQ by using wifi?
Why should wifi compromise SQ? Shouldn't a £3k+ streamer do as good a job with wifi as wired?
Powering up the wireless board on NDX puts more load on the power supply and causes the unit to heat up quite radically. I'm guessing the increased power consumption might be the root cause here. Especially when there's no external PSU.
Get a chep Airport Express and plug that into NDX's ethernet connection. You'll get a cheap upgrade to 802.11n 5GHz "wireless" and NDX operates as wired. Oh, add a toslink to the mix and get a decent AirPlay support today.
Cheers,
M
Why would you spend 3K+ on a high end streamer only to compromise SQ by using wifi?
Why should wifi compromise SQ? Shouldn't a £3k+ streamer do as good a job with wifi as wired?
It's all about the bandwidth–you cannot expect to park a Porsche on a skateboard.
Better throughput = fewer re-fills of the streaming buffer = less power-supply strain = better sound quality.
+1 on the suggestion to use an AirPort Express as a wireless bridge, especially on 5GHz band. I'd add to this that it is important to insure that you are also using fixed wireless channels, DHCP address reservation, etc.
OK OK - I have another length of Cat6 and once my switch arrives I will wire in the streamer - sigh -more hours of coaxing cable between skirting and old floor boards!
Tog
I own the unitiqute, but have an airport express feeding it. I find the wifi reception of the airport is better than the inbuilt receiver, and using airplay is great for casual listening. Itunes is so much easier to use than N Stream.
IMO the only big downside to Nstream is lack of programming playlists - and we hear this is being worked.
A nice enhancement would be to pull info back on the artist / album currently playing from the Internet.
Simon
You're confusing Express with Extreme which is a dual-band router.
Airport Express is el cheapo version of the same thing with certain limitations. Basically it provides wireless bridge for one client + airplay connectivity.
Simon
Simon, absolutely true.
AE can have multiple wireless clients and there's nothing stopping you from connecting a switch/router to it's ethernet port either. I just tried to keep it as simple as possible with the wired example
class="quotedText">
OK OK - I have another length of Cat6 and once my switch arrives I will wire in the streamer - sigh -more hours of coaxing cable between skirting and old floor boards!
Tog
Hi Tog -
Why not run one length of cable only, and add a small 5-port switch near your audio rack?
That's what I did, and my NDX and ATV (for Spotify via AirPlay) now share a local switch. My 5-port switch was very inexpensive, and it came with a long power cable, so I was able to use a different electrical circuit. As far as I can tell, there's been no impact on the NDX's sound quality. I should also note that I have followed Simon's advice, and added a couple of ferrite rings to the NDX's ethernet cable, secured by a ring of Blu Tack.
Good luck!
Hook