I am looking at possibly upgrading my system. I have a Naim 5i V2 integrated, Rega DAC R and Sonus Faber Venere 2.0 speakers (I will not be changing the speakers). I love my system and I do not find it lacking. I also find that the components have great synergy together.
But, I wouldn't mind making it even better. I am not looking to change the sound, but rather keep the same style of sound, and make it even better. I love the Naim sound, and the Rega sound as well. I can buy either the Naim DAC V1 to replace the Rega DAC R, or the Nait XS2 to replace the Nait 5i. I cannot buy both!
I would like opinions as to which would provide the biggest improvement in sound. I imagine the "source first" people will suggest I change the DAC. Then again, some people say that the difference between DACs, is much less than with other components, such as amps and speakers. I admit I am leaning towards replacing the Nait 5i with the Nait XS2.
My second set of questions is, if I replace the 5i with the XS2. If my speakers are a great match for the 5i, will they automatically be a great match with the XS2? I am assuming the XS2 is like a bigger better version of the 5i, so it will have the same type of sound. My assumption could be wrong. I also know that synergy is important.
When my brother was shopping for speakers for his Rega Elex R integrated, he auditioned speakers like mine with his amp. Not a good match! The Veneres are somewhat lively, and so is the Rega Elex R. The sound was just too lively and in your face. He finally bought Sonus Faber Toy Towers. The Toys are more laid back, and are a great match for his Rega amp. I want to avoid this kind of mismatch if I buy the XS2. Of course I will audition first, but I am still curious about hearing people's opinions.
I also assume that if I love the sound of my Nait 5i, I will love even more the sound of a Nait XS2. I have had in the past a Naim Stageline powered by a Flatcap XS, and a DVD5 I used as a CD player. Again, I loved the sound they produced. I get the feeling the Naim sound will always sound right to me. So, I assume I will enjoy any Naim amp, or DAC.
Posted on: 10 November 2017 by SongStream
If you've got a good synergy as is, I personally would head for the XS2 as I think your speakers will benefit from a little extra grunt. If you want to change the DAC later, the V1 matches up well with the XS2. If you are mainly feeding the Rega DAC via USB, that might alter my thinking, as the USB interface on the DAC-V1 is exceptionally well done, and I have read that it is the weak point for the Rega. In my experience the DAC-V1 USB performance betters the SPDIF inputs, but that will be source dependent to at least some degree I would think.
Posted on: 10 November 2017 by ChrisSU
Do you have only digital sources? If so, you don’t need a preamp with the V1, so you could buy that, then replace your Nait with a separate power amp. The 100 is a great match with the V1, and a 200 would be even better if you can find a used one in good condition.
Posted on: 11 November 2017 by charlesphoto
DAC V1 owner and fan here, but you don’t say what you’re running, or plan to run, through the DAC. If USB then yes the V1 will give you the best bang for the buck (esp used). And if you also need to run a turntable then the V1 isn’t the best option as it is digital only inputs.
Posted on: 11 November 2017 by Daniel H.
Thanks for the answers! Yes, I play music through the DAC using USB. I don't agree with What Hi-Fi, that the Rega's USB input is bad. Besides, I have an Intona USB filter that provides galvanic isolation between the Mac Mini I use as a server, and the Rega DAC. Even if the Rega's USB input is not great, the Intona cleans up the signal before it gets there. And yes, adding the Intona did produce a noticeable increase in sound quality.
I no longer use a turntable. I have thought about using the V1 with a power amp like the NAP 100, or 200. Although I only use digital inputs at the moment, I am not prepared to give up the flexibility of having analog inputs.
Posted on: 11 November 2017 by ngarritson
The V-1 is most definitely not an upgrade from the Rega DAC-R, and it costs twice as much. That move will get you nowhere and leave you with less money. Moving to a V-1/100 combo would just be doubling down on a bad bet. The V-1's preamp section is a weakness, in addition to the V-1's lacking the Naim house sound to a degree I have not heard in any other Naim product. The 100 is also unexciting, in my opinion. It is blown away by the 140. When I got a 140 to replace my old 100, its superiority was one of the most obvious hifi experiences I have ever heard. If you want to make a material step forward without spending much money, your best hope is probably the second hand market for control components, e.g. a 72/hi cap/140. The DAC-R can't be bested without spending a lot of money, and it has good synergy with olive. If you must have a remote, then perhaps you should try for an 82, or do nothing until you can get a 282 if you prefer the Classic look.
Posted on: 11 November 2017 by SongStream
A number of comments over the last few years have suggested that the DAC-V1 is less impressive when used as a pre-amp, though I cannot offer any opinion on that as I've not tried it. What I would say though is that as fixed output DAC with a decent USB source it packs quite a punch for the money. Very enjoyable fronting my SN2. A friend of mine has an XS2, and has been through an Arcam IRDAC and the Audiolab MDAC+ in pursuit of better VFM, but after the evening when I took my DAC-V1 over to his house for session, any debate about value was settled by the choons and now he has one of his own. It makes a nice little system PC - V1 - XS2 or SN2, despite the fact it's not the done thing. Certainly a few years ago I would not have entertained the idea of such a configuration, but in practice sounds great if set up properly.
Posted on: 12 November 2017 by Daniel H.
I was leaning towards the XS2 when I started this thread. None of the comments have convinced me otherwise. I will cross the DAC V1 off the list.
Then, I thought about the weakest link in my system. It isn't the Nait 5i. In theory, it is the Mac Mini I use as a server to feed my DAC. I use the Mac Mini's internal HDD to store music. Though, it is not a stock Mac Mini. It is dedicated only to being a music server. All non essential functions like Wifi, spotlight, etc. have been turned off. I use Audirvana 3+ as the music player software. I switched out the cheap stock power cord, with a high quality one (with the use of an adapter). I have an Intona industrial USB isolator between the Mac and DAC, and sorbothane footers on the Mac. Needless to say, it performs much better than a stock Mac Mini.
I was wondering if a component like the Naim Uniti Core, used as a server with internal storage (not an ethernet renderer type device with NAS, etc.) would provide a good improvement in sound quality, over my hot rodded Mac Mini? I think the HDD in my Mac Mini is on its last legs. I have also kept EL Capitan as the OS, because later versions of Mac OS disable direct mode in Audirvana +. I won't be able to avoid upgrading the OS forever. It also seems some USB DACs are no longer recognised whenever Apple comes out with a new OS. A little annoying!
Peace of mind knowing my server will always work with my DAC would be nice. But, for the price of the Uniti Core, I would also want and expect a very good improvement in sound quality. Has anyone compared Core VS Mac Mini for sound quality?
Last spring, I was following the forum threads about the Uniti Core. A lot of people had problems in the first few months of the Uniti Core being on the market. I cannot find some of those threads. Have firmware upgrades gotten rid of the bugs and made the Uniti Core a solid reliable machine?
I can still be happy with a hot rodded Mac Mini. They can be bought for a lot less money than the Uniti Core, if necessary. I would still be curious to read people's experiences and opinions. Nait XS2 to replace Nait 5i, or Uniti Core to replace hot rodded Mac Mini?
I promise this is the last component showdown!
Posted on: 13 November 2017 by Timo
I have no experience with Mac Mini, but it is my impression that implementation matters a lot. Some people with pretty expensive systems, like the Innocent Bystander, use a Mac. So it seems nothing inherently wrong with a Mac as music server. Others suggest a NAS as music server rather than the rather Core, which however offers a certain convenience — convenience at a considerable price though.
Posted on: 13 November 2017 by tonym
Hi Daniel, I used to run a Mac Mini, optimised for audio playback and using a Paul Hynes power supply, running at first Audirvana before I moved to Amarra Symphony with Dirac room correction. This worked very well, but then I tried a Melco player, which comfortably improved on the Mini, even without the room correction. If you can run to it, I strongly recommend you give one a try.