Hi all,
Sorry if that's been answered elsewhere or if the question seems silly to you but I was just wondering what could be the benefit for using the built-in Chromecast capability of the new Uniti range;
in my case for example I have no subscription to any of the streaming platforms as I'm only using the free versions offered like the ones from Spotify and Deezer, i also have a soundcloud accounts.
I'm just wondering why should I use Chromecast to stream from those platforms when most (if not all of them) offer the ability to stream music to my atom from my i-device by simply choosing the Atom among the various renderers listed?
Is there any difference into the sound or does Chromecast offer a specific convenience I'm not aware of ?
Many thanks in advance to enlight me.
Most of the time, I'd stream directly from My Synology Nast to my Atom.
Posted on: 01 March 2018 by ChrisSU
If you're already streaming from your iPhone to an Atom, you must be using either Airplay or Chromecast. The difference is that Chromecast sends the stream directly to your streamer, not via the iPhone like Airplay does. Also, it can support some Hi-Res formats if you need it to, where Airplay is limited to 16/44 max.
Posted on: 01 March 2018 by RadebeR
There is another thread on here discussing Naim's lack of support for voice assistants such as Amazon Alexa and Google Home. It doesn't matter to many people but to some it would be very useful. With that in mind, it's worth mentioning that the Google cast integration allows you to make the Uniti (or other streamer) your default music player for a Google Home device. A Google Home Mini costs £50 (or £30 when it's on sale).... if you ask it to play a tune it will instruct the Uniti to play the tune using Google Cast. If you want to give the Google Home another instruction it will quieten the music while you do so. It works really well and allows other family members to get music playing without needing to master the (ahem) tricky Naim app ;-)
Posted on: 01 March 2018 by SongStream
A Chromecast Audio would in terms of function do the same, and I believe supports the same 24/96 format. However, it's not the finest sound quality, even via optical into a good DAC. Some around here have expressed a scathing account of its performance, personally, I don't think it's that bad, yet still not up to mark either. Not sure why it falls short technically, but I guess the question is, how much can you expect for £30? In the grand scheme of things I think its a capable and clever device for money, but not for me, purely due to SQ shortcomings.