New Uniti Range Roon 1.5 MQA unfolding
Posted by: SimonPeterArnold on 03 May 2018
Well its finally here in Roon. Would like to here impressions from Tidal users and MQA on the new Unitii Atom, Star and Nova.
I ve been listening this evening and so far a bit unimpressed. Everything I have listened to sounds better from the 44.1 stream on my Atom. The MQA seems to have no life, restrained even and is a lot lower in volume. Vocals seem a lot lower in mix to. It does not make me tap my feet or sit up and take notice. Its well boring.
Posted on: 03 May 2018 by Sloop John B
Are you comparing a Tidal 44/16 stream with the MQA version or a local copy with the Tidal MQA - and all through Roon?
.sjb
Posted on: 03 May 2018 by SimonPeterArnold
Tidal for both via Roon on the Atom.
Posted on: 03 May 2018 by SimonPeterArnold
I think it's going to be a very long and heated discussion about MQA. I was open to see and had not made up any preconceptions, but so far it just a bit meh. Like most things audio some recordings will no doubt sound better but so far i have not found one. Although the current Gogo Penguin album I am listening to now sounds very good but so did the normal version will have to compare it.
Posted on: 03 May 2018 by SimonPeterArnold
Also searching now can bring up 3 versions of an album, as some labels have a 96khz and 192khz MQA master, to which defeats it's purpose of the format that all resolutions are decoded/unfolded from the same source.
Posted on: 03 May 2018 by SimonPeterArnold
Compared A hundred Moons on A humdrum Star Deluxe version by GoGo Penguin. Still prefer the 44.1. MQA might be the most accurate one but it did not get me the feeling I got from 44.1.
Posted on: 04 May 2018 by gert
Hello,
I did not follow the MQA hype in detail yet. But I remember that it is meant to bring reduced quality codex nearer to lossless compressions. So how can it be better than real CD quality? Or are you comparing 96kHz or better MQA with 44.1 lossless data?
Posted on: 04 May 2018 by SimonPeterArnold
I am comparing MQA 192/96kHz flac to 44.1 flac
Posted on: 04 May 2018 by Alley Cat
I really can't see the point of MQA in this day and age unless your internet conection is too slow to stream lossless HD audio in other formats. Are MQA files downloadable in which case I guess there might be a copy protection element ?
Posted on: 04 May 2018 by SimonPeterArnold
It's pretty much designed for streaming and a lot of the world and even parts of the UK have pretty rubbish internet still. Also wirless and 192/24 probably not the best bed partners. i see the mobile market as a growing sector and this could have a big impact there. As for copyright protection there is none and I can't see them adding it but don't quote me on that. The music industry went down that route already and look what happened almost went bust. Hopefully they learnt from that mistake. For streaming it makes sense one file that can be played on any device regardless of MQA decoding or not. If you don't you get 48/24 if you have Tidal Desktop or other software such as Roon that does the first unfolds you get 96/24 and if you have an MQA DAC then you get the full monty. I'd rather have MQA then aac or mp3. New phones are already started to add MQA DACs and Tidal app now allows it on mobile to.
It's going to be interesting to see what happens.