Where are the "poor" people ?

Posted by: Arye_Gur on 14 October 2000

Most of the members here are owning such expensive
systems that it makes me green of jealous.

Arn't here any members who don't know if to by a Rotel instead of CD5, An Arcam instead of Nait5,
Rega or Kef instead of Credo ?

Arie

Posted on: 15 October 2000 by Alco
Hello Arie.

Well, I sure can agree with ya' on this issue!
I'm reading the Naim Hifi corner allmost every day
and many times, I'm also thinking:"damn, where do
these guys get the money for all this !?!"
Since most of the members are using the more/most
expensive Naim stuff.
But Arie, I can assure you. Even with a "small" wallet you can have a wonderful,musical system.

I own an old Nait-2 (bought s/h),a Naim-CD3.5
CD-player and Monitor Audio Studio-2 speakers on Target stands. cables by naim.

I'm enjoying it everyday. I had about 12 different
amps, 15 (!) pair of speakers and about 11 CD-players over the last 12 years. Many setups costed me much more then what I have now.
But to me the Naim setup is the most musical one!

So, if you can, try to get your hand on some secondhand Naim gear. (like a nait, to start)

Greetings from Holland,
Alco.undefined

Posted on: 15 October 2000 by Arye_Gur
Hi Alco,

I own now a Naim system - an expensive one then yours but I don't read here memebers like you.

I owned a Nait2 and this is a great amp. I think
that Naim should stil continue manufacturing this amp as an entry level amp.

Arie

Posted on: 15 October 2000 by Rico
quote:
Arn't here any members who don't know if to by a Rotel instead of CD5, An Arcam instead of Nait5, Rega or Kef instead of Credo ?

Dude, I spent 16 years doing exactly that, although with equipment far less costly. Now I'm faced with the same dilemma, only it's "52 or XPS", "135's or SBL's" or "where do I stop" or "I should get out more". Poor? Black box acquisition keeps all of us poor - it's all relative. Most important thing is not to lose sight of the music.

I'd be just as happy listening to CD3/Nait2/Kytes; I just don't have to.

Rico - musichead

Posted on: 15 October 2000 by Don Braid
My system is LP12/CDX/52/250 Aracian Alon II speakers. Yeah, it cost me and I don't care because it's blissful. But I'm always amazed, when I visit a friend, at what wonderful music pours from his Audio Alchemy CD player ($300 Cdn s/h), ancient Thorens table with new Schur cartridge ($300 for the cartridge, table lost lost in the mists of time), Nait 2 ($600 s/h) and B&W 302 speakers ($300 new.) The heart of this system is clearly the magnificent Nait 2, and the whole layout, apart from the long-amortized table, is $1300 Cdn, or about $950 U.S. Abolutely glorious - I often get hung up at his place for hours when I could be listening to my own system at home. We both know mine is far lusher, richer, more revealing, etc etc., but it's also clear that his is every bit as musical and emotional. For cost-quality ratio, The Nait 2 is probably the best single piece in the history of HiFi. Anyone on a budget shout root one out.

Don

Posted on: 15 October 2000 by Andrew Randle
Arie,

You could consider me as being on the 2nd rung of the ladder... having an Mimik/42.5/110/Kan IIs.

Two factors are related to why I don't yet have individual items >£1000. One is age (I'm 27). The other is location (London is so damn expensive - particularly with rent).

Anyway I'm making plans to recify this. One of them is to move back up to York - where there is a "wait-n-see" offer of an excellent job.

Hamish (my dealer at York's Sound Organisation) must be rubbing his hands together.

Andrew

Andrew Randle
2B || !2B;
4 ^ = ?;

Posted on: 15 October 2000 by Arun Mehan
Hey Arie,

I too become jealous of the people on this conference. The first Naim system I ever heard was at Joe Petrik's house. It was a 32.5 with 72 boards (or was it a 72??? sorry Joe) with a 250 feeding into Saras. It totally blew my mind. Unfortunately, I had already bought an Onkyo receiver and an Onkyo 6 disc CD changer feeding into Kef Coda 7 speakers. Of course I thought that my system was amazing until I heard Joe's system. But for the money I paid, I really couldn't have done any better - believe me, I did plenty of research! Since then, I've only been able to afford upgrading the Kef Coda 7 speakers to Kef Q15 and buying a more expensive interconnect. Mind you these were within my budget. I'm a student (and will be for many more years to come) so I have other expenses.

Of course one day I do want Naim equipment, in fact I've been salivating over a Nait5, but I can only spend that kind of money when I have it. If I have to eliminate some non-essential expenditures in order to buy a Naim system then so be it, but for the time being, school is an essential. But it's all relative. Believe me, I'm very happy with my system and people who are not audiophiles are impressed too. I know there's better but I can't afford it so I make due with what I have.

But you'll be surprised. The people on the conference, especially the regulars, are very knowledgeable about audio in general. If you give them an amount of money your willing to spend, they will provide you with a few options and instruct you to listen for yourself to make the ultimate decision. Don't ever think that these guys are snobs or that they can't recommend less costly hifi gear. A lot of them have been through the upgrade ladder and still keep up with the latest gear. I remember when the Rega Planet first came out, the original conference had many threads devoted to whether or not the Rega Planet was a good buy. So even though we can't afford the CDSII, we can ask these audiophiles to recommend an affordable CD player that will make us happy.

Posted on: 15 October 2000 by Bob Edwards
Arie et al--

You bring up a point I have been struggling with for the last couple of years. That is that I have not experienced more MUSICAL satisfaction as my system has gotten demonstrably better. It is also why I am in the process of sorting out my system--going back to an LP12 (even though my Roxy is "better"), going from a 82/Supercap to 72/Hicap, etc.

It has very little to do with money--I could afford everything I have bought, I just don't find that it gives me more musical satisfaction--in fact, just the opposite. I think Arie hit the nail on the head of what I was trying to say in the thread "Back to Basics !"

Cheers,

Bob

Who may be downgrading but is enjoying everything a LOT more !

Posted on: 15 October 2000 by Arye_Gur
I'd said that I'm sure that better systems are more expensive. But in Hebrew we say "to convince the conviced people" which means to speak in a group when you know that all the members are with the same opinion as yours.

I think it is what goes in this forum when most of the members own expensive Naim equipment and
every one is busy telling the others how good Naim systems are. I own Naim too, and I think it is a great system too, but I'm sure that there are "some" people who don't think so and I wish to hear them although I think too Naim is great.

I don't agree (I think Pierre claimed it ) that this is a Naim site so only people who want to talk "Naim" are allowed to speak here. I think (hope) that the people in Naim are wiser then that and I think that maybe there are some different ways to pronounce music via a stereo system and maybe there are people who can talk about it and argue Naim "lovers".
And if I'm wrong - someone can "block" me out of this site anytime he wants - but in this case, I will not be sorry if it happens (and I'll continue to use Naim equipment).

Arie

Posted on: 15 October 2000 by Onthlam
Arie, like so many others I got the hi-fi bug in the Mid 70s. For myself this journey has been one of endless upgrades and learning from my mistakes(putz mait aire sometimes).I still have and use my first Nait 1. (It sounds better than any of my buddies video systems.)It does come down to a matter of taste though. Loud or soft,flat or round,it really comes down to your perception of reality.
Kindly remember one thing tough.
(imho)there is only one thing money can not buy and that is poverty. With Naim, I think, There is a direct correlation between price and performance........This stuff lasts forever.

Ze ah gazoont,
Marc Newman

[This message was edited by Marc Newman on MONDAY 16 October 2000 at 04:25.]

Posted on: 16 October 2000 by Arye_Gur
Marc Newman,

quote:
With Naim, I think, There is a direct correlation between price and performance...

This is the most common idea here and I rest my case.
I wonder if there is someone here who thinks something else.

Arie

Posted on: 16 October 2000 by Tony L
quote:
Most of the members here are owning such expensive
systems that it makes me green of jealous.

I try to be as shrewd as possible when it comes to parting with money. There are very few new components in my system, and I am more than happy to use very old equipment. I try to buy at the point when the equipment has pretty much stopped depreciating, so I will not incur a bad financial hit if I later choose to sell up.

My amplifier and speakers are both good examples - I run a 32-5 / Hicap / 135s which all date from 1987, and a pair of Linn Kan IIs. The amps cost me 1800 quid, and I have paid out to update the 32-5 with 72 boards, bought a black SNAIC, and had everything re-capped. Even with this additional cost, I could easily get back pretty much what I paid as they are such fine examples - I would stand to either break even or loose less than 100 quid should I sell. My speakers date from 1993, I bought them earlier this year for 200 quid, and I already had a pair of stands that had effectively cost me 25 quid - by waiting for a pair in the right condition and finish, and a bit of haggling, I would unquestionably make on the deal if I were to sell.

The above are effectively free - ok the money tied up in the equipment is not earning interest, but it is not loosing much value either. I did buy my source components new, this is very out of character for me, as simply carrying a component outside the shop depreciates it by about 30% - I just really wanted a P9, and they hardly ever come up second hand. The same goes for my Mana amp rack, they just never turn up second hand, and buying before the recent price rise saved me over 100 quid. I am not in anyway discouraging people from buying new, I need the quality companies such as Naim to stay in business, so I can buy the stuff a few years down the track when someone else has run it in and depreciated it for me!

Tony.

Posted on: 16 October 2000 by Arye_Gur
Tony,

I bought all my system LP12, Cdi,Nait3, IBL
as used components (only the flatcap I bought as a new) but it is symply because I can't afford buying new Naim components.

Arie

Posted on: 16 October 2000 by Mick P
Arie

You are a young man so you have loads of time ahead of you and the second hand route is very effective and could almost be regarded as a form of investment because you can nearly always resell at the same price as what you bought.

Each upgrade will make the music better and you have lots to look forward to.

Stick with it.

Mick

Posted on: 16 October 2000 by woodface
Basically I started off with a rega 2, Brio and castle trent 11's about 6 years ago. I now have LP12/ittock/lingo/OC9, CDi, 82/hi-cap/250 & Keilidhs (soon to be replaced with SBL's or similar). I am not rich but due to the benefits of being up north my overheads are not very high; if truth be known I do not know where the money has come from! If I have a bit spare etc I upgrade - but this is not compulsory! It helps if you have an understanding wife who would rather you did not get a motorbike!
Posted on: 16 October 2000 by John Schmidt
Tony,

quote:
The above are effectively free .......it is not loosing much value....

This is the kind of reasoning that got most Western nations (Canada in particular) into such a horrendous debt problem. I'm a confirmed believer in the value of used equipment, especially Naim. However, even if the purchase price is a bargain and the gear holds its value, you still have to pay for it initially, which means you don't have the money to spend on something else (i.e., shoes for your kids and such like. Which I think was Arie's point.

Arie,

quote:
to convince the conviced people

In English, "preaching to the choir (or the converted)"

John Schmidt
"95% of everything is crud" - Theodore Sturgeon

Posted on: 16 October 2000 by Tony L
quote:
This is the kind of reasoning that got most Western nations (Canada in particular) into such a horrendous debt problem.

Which keeps the online price for CDs cheap from AB Sound - it works for me!

Tony.

Posted on: 16 October 2000 by Arun Mehan
I've been lurking for too long, it's time to upgrade my status. I wonder why I have more to say now than ever before??? Anyways...

First of all, it's nice to see more Canadians contributing to the forum. I used to think that the Canadian audioland revolved around London, Ontario at Joe or Vuk's apartment! BTW, I've never understood politics, especially in Canada, nor do I want to so that's all I'm going to say about that.

Vuk, I never thought I would see the day that you bought a Mana rack. Hell, I was going to put in an order for one of those X-type racks that you designed, but now I may wait on that. I have heard the Joe Petrik audio salespitch, but I was never one of those people who believe in the "quick" diet program

Arie, I think for most of the people on this conference, music takes them away from this thing we call life (for me it's an escape from these textbooks). It's an escape. We buy what we can afford, but we also buy what we like. Look at the FEP giants who changed from an LP12 to a P9 (Joe and Tony). They did it because they liked the sound from the P9 more, but not everyone changed. I recently heard a very expensive Krell system fed through Martin Logan Prodigy speakers. The Krell had a huge soundstage and actually sounded nice, but I still prefer the Naim sound. On the other hand, I loved the new Martin Logans even though I didn't enjoy other Logans I have heard. The new Prodigy speakers just sounded great, I think Mike Hanson also had that feeling. Some people may not like those particular speakers at all, and may recommend a Naim speaker, but in the end it's us who must make the final decision. Mike Hanson is another great contributor to this forum because he doesn't really prefer Naim speakers but yet he gets bombarded by people telling him that he should upgrade his Albions to SBLs etc. You won't hear from many people on this conference who don't like Naim equipment, otherwise they wouldn't really enjoy this forum would they. Look at Frank Abela who owns a Chord amp and preamp but yet still offers advice on Naim purchases. We do have diversity and different opinions, don't worry about that. It actually makes for a better conference. We really do welcome you and other newbies to this conference and hope you post more often. You've got me posting more often, so at least be satisfied that you brought one more "poor" person out of lurking for fear that his system just didn't measure up

[This message was edited by Arun Mehan on MONDAY 16 October 2000 at 18:34.]

Posted on: 16 October 2000 by John Schmidt
Arun,

quote:
I used to think that the Canadian audioland revolved around London, Ontario at Joe or Vuk's apartment

Never met Joe or Vuk, but I did spend just over ten years of my life (1975-1986) in the London area and purchased my used Naim gear from a small shop that existed for a few years in Sarnia.

As much as I enjoyed my years in London, the audio scene there is pretty tame compared to what you can find in Montreal.

John Schmidt
"95% of everything is crud" - Theodore Sturgeon

Posted on: 16 October 2000 by Rico
quote:
What a burden it is to have to maintain the reference source for an entire country.

Dr Vuksanovic for the 'oh brother do I have a load to carry' snappy. Well done, P.H.Dee!

Rico - musichead

Posted on: 16 October 2000 by Arye_Gur
Arun says
quote:

I recently heard a very expensive Krell system fed through Martin Logan Prodigy speakers. The Krell had a huge soundstage and actually sounded nice, but I still prefer the Naim sound.

I think it is the first time I read here someone says good words about a system that can be a competitor to Naim.

And Arun, thank you for welcoming me to the forum.

Arie

Posted on: 16 October 2000 by Arun Mehan
Arie, you're giving me more credit than I deserve, not that I don't appreciate it, but there have been many other people on this conference who prefer other components to Naim. But I really think the new Krell CAST system is great sounding especially with the Martin Logan Prodigy speakers. It might not be as quick as the Naim equivalent, but it does other things better. Unfortunately, if you think Naim is expensive, wait until you see the price tag of this stuff, it's out of this world. Interestingly enough, I'm beginning to think they got the idea from Naim and Linn as the basis of the CAST system is Krell-designed interconnects and speaker cables. But I must add that the first time I heard a Naim system, my foot started tapping on its own and I began snapping my fingers to the beat (Joe "Flat Earth" Petrik was quick to point that out!). That didn't happen with the Krell system. Again, personal choice. Tell you what, when we both become rich, how about we buy both a top Naim system and a top Krell system and then we'll show these rich guys who's really boss by having the best of both worlds! But honestly, the guys/gals on this conference really are open to GOOD hifi sytems, especially those that sound musical. These guys really know their stuff and are very open-minded. Trust me, I've been lurking for quite some time now and a nicer bunch of audiophiles can't be found elsewhere.

Vuk, it must be quite a burden to be Naim central for all of Canada I think you're handling the responsibility quite well. Maybe Joe left because he didn't want me at his apartment all the time demonstrating his hifi. I guess this means I'll be visiting you from now on, so be ready. Also there's Mr. Antonelli in Windsor. BTW Dave, what did you do with those Albions? Oh Vuk, I really want to hear the 500 so can you have one by Christmas??? That way, it'll be a gift for you and me

Rico, don't you think Vuk has enough Snappy's already! He doesn't need anymore.

John, I didn't know there was a hifi shop in Sarnia that sold Naim. Then again, I'm fairly new to this addiction. Montreal eh? I wonder where the biggest audiophile community and Naimophile community is in our large country, I just assumed TO had the most audiophiles (Mike Hanson is the Naim representative there I assume). I'm still surprised there are Canadians who can afford Naim equipment with our worthless dollar and terrible taxes.

If anyone wants to hear a great sounding Onkyo/KEF combination, you're always welcome to stop by.

Posted on: 17 October 2000 by Arye_Gur
Arun,
I agree with you about the krell.
When I bought the Nait3 I went to listen to Krell
"cheapest" integrated amp. It sounds great but the price - NAit3 about 1800 US $ (In Israel) and
the integrated Krell 5,000 US $. I think in such
a price Naim suggests better combinations.

I don't advise you to wait until I'll be rich...
go for it by yourself ....

Arie

Posted on: 17 October 2000 by Rico
quote:
Rico, don't you think Vuk has enough Snappy's already! He doesn't need anymore.

Arun

He who earns a snappy, earns a snappy. There are no bell curves, limits, or Academy Panels! If they all end up in just a couple of wardrobes, so be it.

Rico - musichead

Posted on: 17 October 2000 by John Schmidt
Arun,

quote:
I didn't know there was a hifi shop in Sarnia that sold Naim.

A small place above a bank called Sound Perspectives. Long gone, I'm afraid. It was run as a part-time business by four friends, one of whom was retired. They carried Linn, Naim and Krell primarily. It was more a labour of love than a big money-maker, and the closed up around 1990 when three of them were transferred out of the city with their day jobs. I stumbled into the place innocently enough in 1985, wanting to do a home demo of a Nait, and eventually wound up buying one of the owners' 32/SNAPS/250 system for a bargain price. There's an interested story here BTW. After listening to the Nait, my curiosity was piqued regarding used equipment and I found a used 42/110 at London Audio. I was on the verge of buying it when my wife, who was returning the Nait to the store, found this used 32/SNAPS/250. I later found out from the seller (who became a good friend) that London Audio was quite pissed at losing the sale (even though they encouraged me to grab it at the price) and complained to the distributor that the Sarnia store was undercutting their prices!

quote:
I wonder where the biggest audiophile community is

For sheer size, I would guess greater Toronto. But I suspect the Montreal area would win on a per capita basis. I remember my Sarnia friend relaying this tidbit to me as generally accepted industry gossip.

John Schmidt
"95% of everything is crud" - Theodore Sturgeon

Posted on: 17 October 2000 by Eric Barry
As a grad student on a limited budget, I know all about buying cheap. But Tony L is spot on about free hi-fi. In fact, just this morning I figured out that the components that I have bought and sold on my way to upgrades were not only free, but netted me 25% profit (Exposure 20, 32/Snaps, VPI turntable). And (I have gotten better at this) what is in my system would net me 40% more than what I paid, by my conservative estimate. And the older Naim stuff is not going to depreciate much more than it has (though 72s and 140s and 92s and 90s, because they were discontinued, could fall in the next few years). But as long as Naim continue to raise their prices and keep the product line pretty much the same, the used prices will stay pretty stable.

However, if I had just worked for pay as a temp slave for $16/hour, instead of watching the used market for bargains, I might have afforded something even better.

--Eric

Note to management: Infopop wouldn't let me log on yesterday to post this and I have had lost posts and had consistent problems accessing threads at all times of day and night. Any hi-fi piece that was as unreliable as this forum, no matter how good, would not be worth it. I originally thought it was poppycock, but this is beginning to reflect poorly on Naim as a company.