Back to basics !

I think the stereo system is a "medium" (I hope it is the right word)to hear music at home.
The better the system the greater the enjoyment.

I don't think anyone should relate the system in an other way, I find it quite similar to the question - do you want money because you like money or because you like the things you can do with money ?

So unless I have possibility to improve my system
I don't care about it or about the history of it
all I care is that it will play music the right way when I wish it to play.

Arie

I think my ears have become far more finely tuned over the years, as I could see what I loved about this system when I owned it originally i.e. it plays music very well indeed for 1500 quid. But there is no way I could go back to it. I spend a lot of time in recording studios sat in front of desks and monitors tweeking the sound so we're happy with it. I used to hate coming home and playing it on the nait/epos set up cos it just missed so much out, weight, grip,even the timing could be a bit hit and miss when the music got really busy. So it was this frustration which led me to the upgrade ladder, and it's taken a good few years, but now I have a system which reveals how well we did at getting it right in the studio because it does stuff better than nearly every pro studio monitor set-up that I've heard.

It is because of this revealling quality that most engineers and producers (not naming names) won't entertain the idea of buying a decent hifi.
They're gonna hear every bad punch in/ punch out they did in the middle of a vocal or guitar track, they are also gonna hear all the horrible de-esser that was applied to the vocal because they compressed it so much that it became really sibilant.... all this and more, but if thats whats on the record then I want to hear it.

I think perhaps we look back on our starter systems with happy memories because it's where it all started and its what got us more into music. I loved my 1982 X reg blue mini. It was my first car and it went round corners really well. But I wouldn't have another.

I would encourage all CDSII and 52 owners to strongly evaluate this move and act. I might then (somewhat charitably) snap up your unwanted top-flight kit.

Rico - musichead

I used to think back fondly to my first decent system. Back in 1973 I had LP12, Harrison Chapman amp ( one of the fist amps with toroid transformer ) & Studiocraft speakers. This system really kicked.

Music was my whole life then, playing in a band as well, & it has only been in the past few months that I can honestly say that I have a system that I am enjoying more than that one.

What did it for me was going active with my IBL's. I will try not to get on my soap box and preach the virtues of active. It's just that albums that I bought back in '73, for the first time since then, I am actually enjoying more. I put this down to having to spend a great deal of money on a very good system to penetrate my hardened senses.

As I have other things in my life now like wife, children, career, mortgage etc: etc: I think it takes a far greater 'hit' to get to ones soul. I'm fairly confident if I were much younger without a care in the world a far more modest system would totally blow me away.

B

[This message was edited by bob atherton on WEDNESDAY 04 October 2000 at 11:46.

[This message was edited by bob atherton on WEDNESDAY 04 October 2000 at 13:30.]

Otherwise, I'll stick with what I've got now thanks.

Regards,
Frank.

quote:

---

Does anyone else ever look back at when we started out--with a LP12, Nait 1 and Kans or variations on the above--and wonder if it all wasn't more fun that way ?

---

Very often, and to the point where I have ended up with a system that is actually a more polished version of the above.

My old Xerxes / Onix OA21 / Kan IIs offered unbelievable musical value for what it cost when I bought it in 1986/7. After a few misguided upgrade attempts to attain a "full range" sound I'm now back with Kans - to my ears bigger now almost always means less fun - definitely in my price range.

I am now very happy with my P9 / CD17KI / 32-5 / Hicap / 135 / Kan IIs - very similar in concept and overall strengths to both the above systems, just far more detailed, refined, and powerful. I am also a firm believer in the law of diminishing returns, though everyone draws their own line as to where it kicks in, for me it is actually quite low.

Tony.

quote:

---

I might then (somewhat charitably) snap up your unwanted top-flight kit.

---

Not if I get there first, Rico.

I had a moment of audio nostalgia recently when I set up a Nait 2 with B&W 302 speakers for a newbie friend. I was simply astonished at how good the system was, and had a moment of questioning whether I was nuts to upgrade from my originnal Nait to CDX/52/250. Then I went home and listened to it. I don't see how anybody would choose to return to ground zero based on the sole criterion of sound. Finances - now, that's another matter.

Don

Cool Post

Thats all

Regards P.- man of mystery and suspense (it's a colonial thing it seems .I'm not referring to irrigation)

[This message was edited by Pierre on WEDNESDAY 04 October 2000 at 20:08.]

I recall 10 years on the impact of moving from Ittok to Ekos for example; the progression through 1 and 2 Hi Caps to Supercap provided a similar experience. There is no way that I would accept a move in the opposite direction.

Better kit should make this a better, fuller trip. If not, or if your not getting the trip at all (that is, you sit there and listen for each new element - just to see how the kit will render it), why bother?

Of course, you could bother just from the hobbiest end of it, but that's not my bag. For me, the kit is a means to an end :

- GregB
Freedom is not in finding the Holy Grail but in stopping the search for it

I do not have a Naim CD player in the expensive system and so tried an expensive interconnect recently (Nordost Red Dawn). It was much better than my current Blue Heaven ... much more detailed. Interstingly I thought "who needs it", its already a great system and I did not buy it. Hi-Fi, I can handle it.

Nic P

I am going to try going back to a 72/Hicap/250/Kans to see if I can stand it---will report back. I already know the sound won't be as good, I am interested in just getting back to the point where I can't wait to pick up new music and anxiously waited for the next cool release.

See you all in the asylum !

Cheers,

Bob?

quote:

---

So here I am with a downgraded system. Pair of home-brew Monoblocks (not 135-alikes), Three of my PSUs, a 62 a Prefix, a modded LP12/Prefix/Home-brew TT PSU and some Isobariks

---

*Cough*

Monoblocks? THREE PSUs??? Briks???

And you forgot to mention the umpteen levels of Mana.

C'mon - when are you gonna *REALLY* downgrade.

I KNOW you are up to it...

- GregB
[Still reading about TF's escapades with genuine interest]

Tony.

Roll on Mike's alternative. Mean time, keep posting, gang, and don't toss your toys...

Rico - musichead

...now my reply looks a little goofy. Oh well. At least I quoted the important bit

And, Omer, I agree with you about mindset. Some of us, well, me anyway, has trouble forgetting about the hi-fi when the kit costs so much and is an object of obsession. I mean, we (collectively, and exclude yourself if you want) worry about whether the CDX sounds better with our without 3M pads under the feet. With this mindset, how can we possibly forget the hi-fi and just enjoy music?

Sure, it happens sometimes - and there is 'evaluation time' and 'listening time'. But I bet many of us spend *a lot* of time evaluating and have a hard time turning that off and just enjoying music. A downgraded system can be easier to get along with in this regard. But this is all very personal psychological stuff.

I hope those with 52s, CDSIIs, and NAP500s can just enjoy the music their wonderful kit provides

- GregB
Freedom is not in finding the Holy Grail but in stopping the search for it