Nice Photos.
Posted by: u5227470736789439 on 27 February 2008
Here is my candidate as being almost quite good. In fact it is two painstakingly joined.

Taken up in the mountain at Skurdalsvatn in 2000.
Though this one takien in Warsaw in November 2006 is not bad:

I know there are several good photgraphers here, and it would be nice to see some of you best efforts if you feel inclined to share!
George
I'm going to give kite surfing a go later this year - it beats standing in a line to board a boat to the nearest island - taken along the beach from my place
Anyone done any kite surfing here?
Sniper,
I'm giving it a go next time we're in Portugal. I used to do a lot of windsurfing in the '80s on short boards and always wanted to have a go at kitesurfing. I thought I may be getting a bit long in the tooth for this but the daughter of the couple we sometimes stay with is married to an instructor and she says it's physically easier than windsurfing. Unfortunately we only found out on our last day there so it will have to wait until we return.
Enjoy. It looks addictive.
Steve
Backyard anchorage
Jamie,
Up to your usual standard, nice one !
Curious how you achieved the lighting motion, while rest of image is static ?
Hah! Thanks.
Spur of the moment snap. Camera was still set on slow exposure with flash from previous shot (lights foreground and background). So the movement is me bringing the camera up and then the flash 'stills' the cat and tree.
So surfing with sniper, snow in Alaska (surprising!)
Just dull and grey here. Boring.
Thanks Haim. Looking forward to getting outside once the rain stops. Pretty dull and grey here too for the next few days....
Sandy
I know the 14-24 is pretty much the best wide zoom out there but i'd like to use it mostly for landscapes while backpacking. Main reasons i picked the 16-35 would be filter threads(for my 77 ND) lighter weight, less vulnerable front element, and of course the fact that it less expensive. I can still lust over that 14-24 (and 400 f2.8!) but it's just not practical for me...
Yeah, you have to be careful with that front element, for sure. Not helped by a sketchy lens cover system. Lack of a filter thread is also a drawback, I agree. I'm looking forward to getting it on a full-frame body, though. It's not really that wide on a DX.
It's plenty sharp, though. Click through to the full-sized image...
DSC_5650 by winkyintheuk, on Flickr
Never seen 400 Burrard street look so sharp Winky. That 14-24 is a great lens. Even read that the Canon guys have an adapter so they can use it as well!
I'm thinking that lens set of yours is crying out for an FX body to really show what they can do...
Thanks Haim. Looking forward to getting outside once the rain stops. Pretty dull and grey here too for the next few days....
Sandy
Actually I much prefer the colors under grey skies. It is the weak yellowish winter sunlight which ruins everything for me.
I am still holding on to my D200, eventually planning to move to a D800E when all its wrinkles are ironed out. In the meantime I am having great fun using old manual focus Nikkor AIS lenses. They still retain their analog flavor from the film era, dulling the exaggerated sharpness of digital sensors. The picture I posted today was taken with a 31 years old 200mm f/4 which despite its age and lack of modern lens coating has outstanding optics and build quality:
Haim
Winky,
Nice sharp pic.
Haim,
The older Nikkor len's may not have AFS, VR or coated lenses but their optics can be better than some modern lenses today.
CBR,
A bit of a birds nest if you ask me. I hope your cable dressing is neater.
Steve
DSC_5416 by winkyintheuk, on Flickr
DSC_8853 by winkyintheuk, on Flickr
DSC_8709 by winkyintheuk, on Flickr
Sniper,
I'm giving it a go next time we're in Portugal. I used to do a lot of windsurfing in the '80s on short boards and always wanted to have a go at kitesurfing. I thought I may be getting a bit long in the tooth for this but the daughter of the couple we sometimes stay with is married to an instructor and she says it's physically easier than windsurfing. Unfortunately we only found out on our last day there so it will have to wait until we return.
Enjoy. It looks addictive.
Steve
Steve,
Physically easier than windsurfing sounds good to me. Be sure to let us hear about your exploits. It does indeed look addictive.
The Nikkor 50 f1.4 is okay, but it's a slow focuser, has barrel distortion, not the sharpest lens (f1.4 never do) and the most important fact that 50mm really does ruin 95% of shots. There's someone here, I think from looking at their pics, that uses 50mm on everything and it's a shame because they are all seriously lacking drama and perspective. It's a very specialised focal length and should be used very rarely, like the square format! You should learn when to use it and that's all part of the skill in photography.
The 35 f1.4 is a wonderful "standard" lens that stays on the camera. It will draw you (physically) into the subject, whilst the f1.4 will isolate it beautifully. It's one lens that will force you to take better pics.
The 14-24 f2.8 is a pain regarding filter size, but the optics are superb and the range allows for shots previously unattainable.
I have found all modern Nikkors better than the older equivalents.