Nice Photos.

Posted by: u5227470736789439 on 27 February 2008

Most of us have taken one or two nice photos.

Here is my candidate as being almost quite good. In fact it is two painstakingly joined.

Taken up in the mountain at Skurdalsvatn in 2000.

Though this one takien in Warsaw in November 2006 is not bad:

I know there are several good photgraphers here, and it would be nice to see some of you best efforts if you feel inclined to share!

George

Posted on: 03 August 2013 by BigH47

Been waiting long?

Posted on: 03 August 2013 by BigH47

Not one of mine, unfortunately:-

Posted on: 04 August 2013 by Kevin-W

More solid gold choc - better on Flickr

Posted on: 04 August 2013 by JamieWednesday

Urban

Posted on: 04 August 2013 by GraemeH

From my youngests 10th yesterday. G

Posted on: 04 August 2013 by JamieWednesday

Please, just don't blink...

Posted on: 04 August 2013 by Kevin-W

Originally Posted by JamieWednesday:

Don't Blink

That's really quite creepy J. Where is it?

Posted on: 04 August 2013 by Kevin-W

Originally Posted by JamieWednesday:

Please, just don't blink...

Nice.

Posted on: 04 August 2013 by Bananahead

Found this bad boy having a swim in the pool. I explained that the chlorine was probably not that good for him.

Posted on: 05 August 2013 by GraemeH

Pleasureland. G

Posted on: 05 August 2013 by Kevin-W

Love the light and the composition on that one G.

Posted on: 05 August 2013 by Kevin-W

More solid gold chocolate

Posted on: 05 August 2013 by JamieWednesday

Wonka bars?

The Weeping Angel in the above pics was at a Doctor Who exhibit in our City museum. My youngest wouldn't go anywhere near, as the 'real' Angels are of course themselves statues so, unlike Cybermen etc.,these were very real indeed!

Posted on: 05 August 2013 by winkyincanada

Originally Posted by Kevin-W:

More solid gold chocolate

This seems so pointless. Not a clever idea, not hard to do, not interesting and not attractive. Why?

Posted on: 05 August 2013 by JamieWednesday

Marketing

Posted on: 05 August 2013 by Steve2701

Posted on: 05 August 2013 by Kevin-W

Originally Posted by winkyincanada:

Originally Posted by Kevin-W:

More solid gold chocolate

This seems so pointless. Not a clever idea, not hard to do, not interesting and not attractive. Why?

So, if you happened to win one, you'd give it back, right?

To Mondelez International, which owns Cadbury, it's anything but pointless. It'll help them sell more chocolate, which is of course exactly what they want. And eight people will be - depending on gold prices - be £22,000 or so better off.

Posted on: 05 August 2013 by Sandy8

Detroit

Posted on: 05 August 2013 by winkyincanada

Originally Posted by JamieWednesday:

Marketing

So therefore a dead-weight loss to society.

Posted on: 05 August 2013 by Kevin-W

Originally Posted by winkyincanada:

Originally Posted by JamieWednesday:

Marketing

So therefore a dead-weight loss to society.

But also - for better or worse - the oil that keeps the capitalist system moving.

Try abolishing marketing or advertising and see what happens.

(And what is this forum, if not marketing for Naim?)

Posted on: 05 August 2013 by Kevin-W

Early morning tram, Helsinki

Posted on: 06 August 2013 by winkyincanada

Originally Posted by Kevin-W:

Originally Posted by winkyincanada:

Originally Posted by JamieWednesday:

Marketing

So therefore a dead-weight loss to society.

But also - for better or worse - the oil that keeps the capitalist system moving.

Try abolishing marketing or advertising and see what happens.

(And what is this forum, if not marketing for Naim?)

I don't want to abolish it, but simply point out that it is a negative-sum game that adds no net value.

Posted on: 06 August 2013 by Haim Ronen

Life after Death

http://www.flickr.com/photos/h_ronen/9453078919/

Posted on: 06 August 2013 by Bananahead

Posted on: 07 August 2013 by GraemeH

Superb Bananahead. G