Advanced search

Nice Photos.

Posted by: u5227470736789439 on 27 February 2008

Most of us have taken one or two nice photos.

Here is my candidate as being almost quite good. In fact it is two painstakingly joined.



Taken up in the mountain at Skurdalsvatn in 2000.

Though this one takien in Warsaw in November 2006 is not bad:



I know there are several good photgraphers here, and it would be nice to see some of you best efforts if you feel inclined to share!

George
Posted on: 16 October 2008 by Chalshus
Kongsten Fort.



Larger image here
Posted on: 17 October 2008 by Geoff P
BRYCE

Posted on: 17 October 2008 by Lontano
Posted on: 17 October 2008 by winkyincanada
quote:
Originally posted by Lontano:


Nice. A single image or composite? If it is single exposure it was incredible to get the sky, opera house and water all well exposed. I'd be tempted to photoshop some full-moon detail onto the white disc - but that would be cheating Razz .
Posted on: 17 October 2008 by Lontano
quote:
Originally posted by winkyincanada:

Nice. A single image or composite? If it is single exposure it was incredible to get the sky, opera house and water all well exposed. I'd be tempted to photoshop some full-moon detail onto the white disc - but that would be cheating Razz .


The photo is exactly as taken - no trickery. I was sitting having dinner at Doyles fish restaurant and looked out and saw this wonderful view that I had to take a picture of. This was at 6.30pm in the evening.

I had to handhold this picture as I did not have a tripod with me, so I put the camera on ISO 3200 and took this shot. Even with the high ISO I was able to blow this picture up to a 36 * 24 inch print and the quality was awesome - no noise whatsoever.
Posted on: 18 October 2008 by winkyincanada
This is a "correct" exposure of the scene. A combination of blown highlights and no shadow detail.




This is a 3-shot HDR combo (The image above is the middle exposure). Sure, this one's a bit "fake" and cartoony/videogame, but it more closely resembles the detail I could see with naked eye as I took the shots. I'm convinced. It is my very first HDR effort (with Photomatix plug-in).

Posted on: 18 October 2008 by winkyincanada


This also from my apartment this evening. No HDR - just underexposed a stop-or-two...
Posted on: 19 October 2008 by Haim Ronen
quote:
Originally posted by winkyincanada:


This also from my apartment this evening. No HDR - just underexposed a stop-or-two...


Winky,

That is a striking shot. I love those deep tones and the depth that the low building with hardly any lights in the foreground gives. You make me feel guilty since I hardly touched my D200 in the last six weeks.

You might be interested in the work of Michael Wolf who just came out with a photography book of buildings in Chicago, a lot of them taken at night.



By the way, what is HDR?

Regards,
Haim
Posted on: 19 October 2008 by winkyincanada
HDR stands for High Dynamic Range and is a digital processing technique that is currently very trendy. Basically, you take a few bracketed shots of the same scene then combine them with software. Put simply, the highlights are mostly taken from the underexposed shot and the shadow details come from the overexposed shot. It's sort of like reducing the contrast of your image, but it picks up a lot more detail. I works best if the shots are exactly aligned, but the software tries to correct what it can.
Posted on: 19 October 2008 by Haim Ronen
quote:
Originally posted by winkyincanada:
HDR stands for High Dynamic Range and is a digital processing technique that is currently very trendy.


Thanks.

I was afraid that it was going to be something hydrolic. I am way too slow to catch up with all those trends so I am just happy to be out of touch.

Another question: was your original image a vertical or an horizontal one?

Haim
Posted on: 19 October 2008 by winkyincanada
quote:
Originally posted by Haim Ronen:
quote:
Originally posted by winkyincanada:
HDR stands for High Dynamic Range and is a digital processing technique that is currently very trendy.


Thanks.

I was afraid that it was going to be something hydrolic. I am way too slow to catch up with all those trends so I am just happy to be out of touch.

Another question: was your original image a vertical or an horizontal one?

Haim


Horizontal
Posted on: 19 October 2008 by winkyincanada


This is different idea. Same scene, different exposure.

Link below to the MW site. Thanks for the tip, Haim.

Michael Wolf - Transparent City
Posted on: 19 October 2008 by Haim Ronen
quote:
Originally posted by winkyincanada:
This is different idea. Same scene, different exposure.

Link below to the MW site. Thanks for the tip, Haim.

Michael Wolf - Transparent City


Michael Wolf's book is very large and its images are very impressive.
I am definitely going to drag my tripod to the city and do some night shooting before it gets to be too cold.

Haim
Posted on: 19 October 2008 by Tony Lockhart
I took a trip to the Mosquito Museum near London Colney for the first time today. Here's a couple of photos of the prototype Mosquito a few yards from where she was built in secrecy:





Difficult light, and no space!

Tony
Posted on: 19 October 2008 by winkyincanada
Posted on: 21 October 2008 by Lontano
Turimetta Beach Sydney
Posted on: 21 October 2008 by Lontano
Sydney Skyline
Posted on: 21 October 2008 by Former member
Haim,
That shot you mailed me a few weeks ago of that thing with 8 legs, you should post it.
Munch
Posted on: 21 October 2008 by Lontano
Here's one for you Munch - a Sydney Funnel Web, the world's most poisonous and dangerous supposedly. I fished this out of the pool in our garden. Used to get one or two a year.


By the way, the spider in the bottom picture is very much alive and dangerous.
Posted on: 21 October 2008 by John M
quote:
Originally posted by Lontano:
Turimetta Beach Sydney




Hang on - isnt that the inside cover of Yes "fragile" by Roger Dean....
Posted on: 21 October 2008 by Lontano
quote:
Originally posted by John M:
Hang on - isnt that the inside cover of Yes "fragile" by Roger Dean....


Do you mean this one? It's the Close to the Edge album. Had never thought of that!
Posted on: 21 October 2008 by Former member
Jonn knows his album covers. Cool
Posted on: 21 October 2008 by John M
the first time I wrote close to the edge then edited it to fragile. i was going on memory, and i second guessed meself. But it is eerily close , no?
Posted on: 21 October 2008 by Former member
quote:
Originally posted by John M:
the first time I wrote close to the edge then edited it to fragile. i was going on memory, and i second guessed meself. But it is eerily close , no?
John you have mail
Munch
Posted on: 21 October 2008 by Lontano
quote:
Originally posted by John M:
But it is eerily close , no?


It certainly is. Roger must have been to Sydney! That beach is a very lovely place and very popular with photographers. I got there one morning at 5am and there were about 10 other people as mad as me.