Nice Photos.
Posted by: u5227470736789439 on 27 February 2008
Here is my candidate as being almost quite good. In fact it is two painstakingly joined.
Taken up in the mountain at Skurdalsvatn in 2000.
Though this one takien in Warsaw in November 2006 is not bad:
I know there are several good photgraphers here, and it would be nice to see some of you best efforts if you feel inclined to share!
George
Spent yesterday cloud hunting in Wales.
Your move.

Is that they?

JamieWednesday posted:Is that they?
It is J.
On another note, I'm in love with your cat (or the cat that features regularly in your photos). Can I adopt him/her?
Mr Fjeld posted:
I crop nearly every shot. I rarely find the default aspect ratio to actually suit the image.
I also dislike the standard ratio in a more general sense, finding it aesthetically unattractive.
winkyincanada posted:Mr Fjeld posted:I crop nearly every shot. I rarely find the default aspect ratio to actually suit the image.
I also dislike the standard ratio in a more general sense, finding it aesthetically unattractive.
There you go. We see it differently and there is no "right" answer to this.
Out of curiosity - which format do you use? I find "full format" to be close to the 35 film format which I'm used to before digital photography and that's perhaps why I prefer not to crop.
On the telly I prefer 16:9........
fatcat posted:Spent yesterday cloud hunting in Wales.
That is a most bizarre reflection. I am not sure why but it is disconcerting.... I really like it. Well done.
fatcat posted:Your move.
Lined up perfectly, but not on the squares, which is odd. Good picture.
Haim Ronen posted:
Incongruous. That expensive looking bike would last 30 seconds in London, then you'd never see it again! It strangely reminds me of the famous picture of a raw egg in a filthy workman's glove that had taken the shape of the hand*. I love incongruity.
*It was the glove that was filthy, not the workman, though me might also have been.
Atom/Iota/Kan Stands posted:This is a common subject, but you have given it an eerie, almost sinister quality. Very effective! Well done.
Thanks very much, [@mention:75342530992722360] x
Atom/Iota/Kan Stands posted:fatcat posted:Your move.
Lined up perfectly, but not on the squares, which is odd. Good picture.
Thanks.
It was taken in a place where things are not always as they appear, it’s an optical illusion. I cunningly achieved it by getting very low to the ground.
I've had a bad back ever since.![]()


Afternoon play at Cal Anderson Park
count.d posted:seakayaker posted:
South Park Bridge
Lovely shot seakayaker. How did you produce the slight black glow around the shadow detail?
If memory serves me right I was using one of the HDR effects in the NIK software tools. NIK was a small company that developed digital software tools that Google had purchased. Google has since sole the rights to DxO. A blurb from their website, "Nik Collection by DxO is a series of 7 creative plugins for MacOS*, Windows* and Adobe CC, providing filters, rendering and photography retouching tools to create stunning images." When I bought the software years ago it was a couple of hundred US dollars, google offered the software as free download for awhile, DxO offers the package for $69.00 and a fun tool for folks who enjoy photography.
Nice, 15 July 2018.
Quite the atmosphere


Shot 1 is trif!
JamieWednesday posted:Shot 1 is trif!
I'm with Jamie - it really is terrific!

![Night-time Shadows [Explored]](https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5486/11727210685_0eb06a83df_b.jpg)






