I have been contemplating adding a DAC to my NDX/XPS2 to see (or should that be hear) what it can bring to the party. And so thought it about time i made inroads into Having a few home demos. After looking around at products that are within my budget i came across the Chord Hugo DAC.
Although it is meant to be a portable headphone unit, it can be used as a full line level fixed DAC.
The dealer lent me a TQ black digital coax lead, which have twist grip plugs. This was required as the present batch of Hugo's have a case design fault that wont allow any decent cable to fit, soon to be rectified. Thankfully the TQ just manages to hang on to the coax port.
Once all connected and gone through the minimal setup procedure of the Hugo, what does the red LED mean again, i left it to warm up for half an hour.
Poured a beer and sat down for an evenings listening.
What was that, where did that come from, that's what that instrument is. OMG, as my little'n would say, Where is it getting all this detail from.
After spending last night and today with it, all i can say is that it has totally transformed my system from top to bottom. I never considered my NDX to be veiled or shut in, not even sure that's the correct terms. All i can say is its opened up the sound stage and space around instruments. Everything I've put through it has had my toes, feet and legs tapping away to the music.
Even putting the toe tapping, the resolution the clarity to one side, what its greatest achievement for me has been in making albums that I've had trouble listening too enjoyable now.
One added bonus is that it has made the XPS redundant. I cannot hear any difference with it in or out of the system.
While i thought a DAC may make a change in the degree of the jump from ND5 to NDX, i was not prepared for this. Anyone looking at adding a PSU to there NDX may want to check this unit out first.
For me this has to be the bargain of the year.
Posted on: 01 June 2014 by Foxman50
Originally Posted by KRM:
The relevance of the What Hi-Fi review is that it contains the opinion of a professional reviewer comparing the Hugo to a Naim DAC. It may be that writing for a magazine renders any opinions inferior to cvrle's, but I found it interesting that they clearly loved it, but appeared to stop short of claiming it is an NDS beater.
I totally agree that the fact that Naimees here are making this claim suggests that this is a remarkable product and these views should be taken very seriously. I would want to hear a Hugo if I was looking to buy a DAC today. Also, I know how it feels to report something here that defies normal hi fi logic, having been a AQ ethernet early adopter.
Feelings not hurt, by the way :-)
I tend to take all reviews with a pinch of salt. At the end of the day my ears are mine and no one elses. If a reviewer says Hugo is the bees knees, well good for him, but it doesn't mean i will feel the sam, even though thats exactly how i do feel. But there maybe many who prefer the V1 in there setup,
To me reviews are great to find out what kit is around and what functions they have, nothing more.
Having said all that its always nice to have an item you've purchased regarded highly in reviews
Graeme
Just to add i'm never keen on saying that one piece of kit is better than another, but i defy anyone to add a Hugo on the end of an NDX and say they don't prefer it.
Posted on: 01 June 2014 by tonym
Wrong of me to make comparisons between my QBD76 & the Hugo, but people whose opinions I trust tell me they're remarkably similar in sound. Not surprising given their parentage I suppose. The Hugo wasn't around when I bought my Chord but hey ho, I enjoy excellent sound so I've no regrets.
I do have a V1 in a second system and it's a really excellent device. Not as good as the Chord but, in isolation, it sounds superb, is such a lovely thing and I enjoy the convenience of remote control (I use it with several digital sources there)
Posted on: 01 June 2014 by Jude2012
Originally Posted by Foxman50:
If chord have produced such a good sounding DAC in Hugo, how much better can they make it to sell as the upgrade to the QBD. i understand the diminishing returns argument, but each step up in cost still has to supply a sizeable upgrade in SQ.
But then i suppose this is all dependent on the funds one has to spend.
Graeme
I'm not sure Chord have to produce a better sounding DAC, they IMO, need to make a better product. Being clear, in my mind, the SQ and the Product are two different things.
A better product for me, and no doubt some others, would be having the Hugo SQ with the features of the V1 or strip out the Headphone, 'pre-amp' and battery, selling it as a pure DAC.
Unless, I have missed something in this thread, I have not seen accounts of the Hugo being used directly into a NAP.
This is all good news, even if the Hugo tech comes out in another Chord, Naim, or another brand's product in the future.
J 
Posted on: 01 June 2014 by lovethatsound
Hi jan, how r you getting on with the wireworld supper nova 7 optical cable and what end did you order 2 fit the hugo? Ps does it do 24/192 as well? Thanks in advance. lts
Posted on: 01 June 2014 by Jan-Erik Nordoen
Originally Posted by lovethatsound:
Hi jan, how r you getting on with the wireworld supper nova 7 optical cable and what end did you order 2 fit the hugo? Ps does it do 24/192 as well? Thanks in advance. lts
I'm not getting on with it, because neither end fits the effing small hole on the Hugo's optical input...
Back to the stock optical that came with the Hugo, and a cheap one I picked up at a music store. Is the optical slightly softer than the coax when feeding from the UnitiServe ? Possibly, but I can't say there is a strong and consistent difference between the two.
The Hugo seems quite cable agnostic.
Can anyone recommend a good USB to mini-USB cable ?
Jan
Posted on: 01 June 2014 by Kevin Richardson
Originally Posted by Jan-Erik Nordoen:
Originally Posted by lovethatsound:
Hi jan, how r you getting on with the wireworld supper nova 7 optical cable and what end did you order 2 fit the hugo? Ps does it do 24/192 as well? Thanks in advance. lts
I'm not getting on with it, because neither end fits the effing small hole on the Hugo's optical input...
Back to the stock optical that came with the Hugo, and a cheap one I picked up at a music store. Is the optical slightly softer than the coax when feeding from the UnitiServe ? Possibly, but I can't say there is a strong and consistent difference between the two.
The Hugo seems quite cable agnostic.
Can anyone recommend a good USB to mini-USB cable ?
Jan
Jan -
I think you need a usb micro for the Hugo.
Are you using a Lunar rca->DIN for your Hugo?
My quest is nearly complete.